Showing posts with label ironio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ironio. Show all posts

2015-08-30

John Wilkins & irony (3): Adorno postscript

In my first post on this subject, I mentioned:

"Ironic Serif: A Brief History of Typographic Snark and the Failed Crusade for an Irony Mark" by Maria Popova (Brain Pickings)

As it happens, Popova wrote another piece on punctuation concerning an author who commands a great deal of my attention:

Theodor Adorno on the Art of Punctuation by Maria Popova (Brain Pickings)

Adorno took punctuation very seriously, as evidenced by an essay I have not seen: “Punctuation Marks.”
A translation of it by Shierry Weber Nicholsen was first published in the Summer 1990 issue of the poetry journal The Antioch Review and later included in Jennifer DeVere Brody’s altogether excellent Punctuation: Art, Politics, and Play (public library), the essay explores the “definitive physiognomic status” of each punctuation mark, its uses and abuses in the hands of writers, and how punctuation helps shed light on the relationship between language and music which, as we know, worked in tandem to help humanity evolve.

Popova proceeds to detail Adorno's views. Note that Adorno vehemently objected to punctuating ironic remarks. (Note also that she links to her article on the ironic serif.)

Note that Adorno's essay is discussed in Brody’s Punctuation: Art, Politics, and Play, but it is not reprinted there. Adorno's essay was collected in book form here:

Adorno, Theodor W. “Punctuation Marks,” in Notes to Literature; Volume One, edited by Rolf Tiedemann, translated by Shierry Weber Nicholsen (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), pp. 91-97.

2015-08-28

John Wilkins & irony (2)

I have created a web page with the relevant chapter in Wilkins where he discussed irony, along with a supplementary bibliography and web links:
I have also updated the other two relevant bibliographies:
Here are the most relevant links and references not included in my previous post (but all are included in the web page on Wilkins):

Shady Characters: The secret life of punctuation:
Irony & Sarcasm marks, part 1 of 3 by Keith Houston

Trettien, Whitney Anne. ‘The Sound of the Printed Letter’: Orthography, Orthoepy, Print and Dictionaries in Print Culture. Thesis, Hood College, 2007. See also author’s web site.
‘The Sound of the Printed Letter’: Orthography, Orthoepy, Print and the Naturalization of English Dictionaries. Queen’s University, June 3-5, 2010. Excerpt from full work (above).
The Republic of Codes: Cryptographic Theory and Scientific Networks in the Seventeenth Century by Robert Batchelor, November 1, 1999 [Work in Progress]

Word and Self Estranged in English Texts, 1550-1660; edited by L. E. Semler, Philippa Kelly. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2010.

2015-08-25

John Wilkins & irony

You learn something old every day. For close to 50 years I've known about John Wilkins' An Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language (London, 1668), but I didn't know about this.

Irony punctuation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"In 1688, John Wilkins in his famous Essay Towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language proposed using an inverted exclamation mark to punctuate ironic statements."

The source cited for this tidbit is:

Houston, Keith (2013). Shady Characters: The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols & Other Typographical Marks. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., pp. 212–214.

Much more detail is provided here:

"Ironic Serif: A Brief History of Typographic Snark and the Failed Crusade for an Irony Mark" by Maria Popova (Brain Pickings)
In the ancient world, however, humorists relied on their audience’s intellect to detect the irony and didn’t find it necessary to flag it as such. But by 17th-century England, writers had become increasingly restless about pointing out irony readers might miss, and so the first documented punctuation mark denoting irony was born in 1668, the brainchild of the English vicar and natural philosopher John Wilkins — brother-in-law of the royalists’ bête noire Oliver Cromwell, one-time head of Trinity College (of which pioneering astronomer Maria Mitchell wrote in her diaries that “in the opinion of a Cambridge man, to be master of Trinity is to be master of the world”), and eventually appointed as the first secretary of the newly founded Royal Society. Wilkins was a kooky character, who believed the moon was inhabited by aliens, proposed the construction of submarine “Arks,” invented transparent beehives that allowed for the extraction of honey without killing the bees inside, and wrote the very first book on cryptography published in English. But his most memorable accomplishment was the publication of his Essay Towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language, in which he proposed, two centuries before the invention of Esperanto, a new universal language of letters and symbols — a sort of “steroidal, all-encompassing Dewey Decimal System where concepts were organized into a rigid hierarchy.”
Houston amplifies on the concerns of that era, characterized as "information overload". Popova continues:
What prompted Wilkins to propose this punctuational improvement remains unknown, but we do know that he was neither the only nor the first thinker who pondered the problem. Some sixty years earlier, the revered Dutch Renaissance humanist and social critic Desiderius Erasmus, after whom Rotterdam’s prestigious Erasmus University is named, lamented the lack of punctuation for irony, observing that “irony has no place, only different pronunciation.”

We do not know whether Wilkins was aware of Erasmus' comments. In any case, Wilkins' lesser-known proposal sank along with his highly touted artificial language, which Houston characterizes as the "last best hope" of the philosophical-language movement of the era. The balance of the ill-fated history of the irony mark, which continues to our day, is an equally fascinating story, and the question is addressed as to why it never caught on, even in the Internet era.

Considering that the purpose of the philosophical language movement was to create a logically tight structured means of discourse as an aid to the scientific revolution, it is all the more ironic that Wilkins would also be concerned about irony.

Further research is indicated.

Additional links:

Irony, Humor, & Cynicism Study Guide

Philosophical and Universal Languages, 1600-1800, and Related Themes: Selected Bibliography

An Essay Toward a Real Character and a Philosophical Language by John Wilkins

Ironisigno- Vikipedio

2015-01-23

Karolo Piĉ, Borges, & ars combinatoria

Dankon denove al Paulo Silas:


Por sia neologismemo Piĉ referencas al Jorge Luis Borges kaj ars combinatoria (kombinarto). Borges ja esploris la senfinan bibliotekan kombinismon, sed en multaj verkoj Borges montras, se nur implice, la sterilecon de tia praktiko. Borges kompreneble ludus per la platoneska cerbumado de Piĉ, sed li estis fundamente skeptikulo.

Konsultu mian eseon "Borges kaj mi: La sekreta miraklo" en Beletra Almanako, n-ro 20, junio 2014, p. 96-101, kaj miajn anglalingvajn analizojn de liaj verkoj kun resumo de mia vidpunkto en eseo "Borges Ironizing Idealism: I Dream Too Much."

2014-09-01

Victor Sadler: Memkritike & plu

Sadler, Victor. Memkritiko: poemaro. Roskilde: Eldonejo Koko, 1967. 60 p.

Sadler pozas kiel redaktoro de la volumo. Sur la titolpaĝo estas citaĵo el Maŭ Zedong: "Ni devas deteni nin de memkontentemo." En la Antaŭparolo Sadler ŝajnigas sin trovanto de kolekto de poemoj manuskriptaj de iu konato, kies verkaro li jam moketas. Ĉiu poemo portas numeron. "Elektitaj" poemoj aperas en la libro sed ne laŭ la ordo de numeroj. Ĉiun poemon sekvas kritiko. Sed, laŭ la ironia tono de la tuta poemaro, ĉu la kritikoj mokas sin mem, ne nur la poemojn?

La memkritikoj estas tre amuzaj. La lingvaĵo de la poemoj estas tre lerta, eĉ kiam Sadler rikanas pro  trouzo laŭ li de kliŝaj rimedoj. Tamen, ofte estis malfacile por mi sorbi la signifojn de la versoj. Mi devus relegi.

Jen la enhavo kun ligoj al retpaĝoj de koncernaj poemoj (krom #65, sen memkritikoj):

Indekso laŭ poemnumeroj

Numero    Titolo / Unua verso     Paĝo


    29    Aliaj kantis, Vintro     18
    36    En vi, decembro     19
    46    Tiaflame     16
    49    La mev-gardanto     24
    53    Elegio jarfina     11
    57    La Botanika Ĝardeno, Cambridge     29
    59    Damaoj mutaj velure vagas tra mia     38
    60    Mevoj I     21
    61    Pledo     50
    62    Mozaiko     52
    64    Mevoj II     22
    65    Mi, dezirante ĉerkon     47
    67    Mi estas via reĝo     41
    68    Kiel senhejma maIjunulo     37
    70    neniun sorĉon kontraŭ     48
    71    negranda knabino .     36
    72    Mi ĉizus kantomilionojn     43
    75    aŭdiĝi     34
    76    el     55
    80    Mi serĉis rarajn ratnapurojn     46
    83    Ĉiĝangale padas jam nur mi     39
    84    Riveron fonto difinas     35
    85    Kranion vian testamentu     32
    86    Foje, kiam pense mi esploras per     40
    87    Se ankaŭ nun .       42
    88    Per kapriolaj hakoj   54
    89    Malnovajn temojn    49
    90    Momenton senpretende paseman mi retenis kaj     28
    91    Kursive mi parolis, miaj infanoj     56
    92    En pli junaj jaroj     45
    93    Kalendaro     26
    94    Tilioflaro     27
    95    el via harodoro     30
    96    Dioj! ne deviu mi de mia devo       9
    97    Refoje tremo simpatika     31
    98    Sordini lipe lipan tremon     33

Mozaiko estas tipografie iom malsimila en la libro.

La originala titolo de Damaoj mutaj velure vagas tra mia estas "Akrostike".

Pluaj poemoj interrete troveblaj estas:

Al iu Francesca
Mateniĝo
Vagula kanto