Showing posts with label Ĉinio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ĉinio. Show all posts

2019-03-09

Hungara Literaturo pere de Ĉina Radio Internacia

Hungara Literaturo” (17:50) verkis László (Ladislao) VIZI por Ĉina Radio Internacia, laŭtlegis Jianping ZHAO. 2017-02-27.
@ 3:25: Nyugat (Okcidento). Hungaraj kleruloj kaj verkistoj subtenis Esperanton.

@ 5:32-7:00: Karinthy & Vojaĝo al Faremido.

Plu pri Nyugat. Kalocsay, poste Baghy. Nyugat modelo por Literatura Mondo. Sándor Petőfi, Dezső Kosztolányi, János Arany, k.a.

2018-09-11

Verda Majo: Esperanto kaj demokratio

"Mireille Grosjean deklamas tekston de Verda Majo (Hasegawa Teru), aperinta en Lernilo de Esperanto n-ro 11-12 ; nov.-dec., 1943, sub la titolo 'Esperanto kaj demokratio'. La deklamo okazis en la 77a Hispana Kongreso de Esperanto kaj la 51a Kongreso de ILEI, okazintaj en Madrido en 2018."

2018-09-05

Verda Majo: Du pomoj perditaj

"S-aninoj Hideko Huzimoto, el Japanio, kaj s-anino Yu Jianchao, el Ĉinio deklamas fragmenton de la poemo de Verda Majo [HASEGAWA Teru] "Du perditaj pomoj" en la programero 'Vivu la teatro' de la 77a Hispana Kongreso de Esperanto, okazinta kune kun la 51a ILEI-Kongreso en Madrido en julio 2018."

2017-05-21

Gregor Benton on the proletarian Esperanto movement


I vaguely recall the name Gregor Benton from somewhere; I assume he surfaced somewhere in my erstwhile study of the history of Trotskyism. I see that he is a specialist on China and that he has published on Chinese Trotskyism, Maoism, and Chinese communism overall.

I am familiar with Jacobin magazine. In a country where the very name of Marx is taboo, Jacobin is the most widely known Marxist magazine in the country, "widely" being a relative term but at least not totally invisible among the intellectual reading public. Many years ago, when the magazine was still in gestation, at least one person involved in it was interested in interviewing me on C.L.R. James, but this never materialized.

Nobody in the USA, on the left or otherwise, cares about Esperanto, so I was quite surprised when this article surfaced in Jacobin and by which author:

"Communism in Words" by Gregor Benton

"A brief history of Esperanto, the language intimately tied to the common destiny of the working class."

I can imagine the horror of many American Esperantists to see Esperanto associated with communism in this way, though there are some who have mentioned the proletarian Esperanto movement as an historical phenomenon. Benton's father, who fought against the fascists in the Spanish Civil War, defended Esperanto to comrades who dismissed it, using the phrase "communism in words" (which I have never seen anywhere else). Gregor himself learned Esperanto and delivered a euology to his father in Esperanto for the Catalan Esperanto Association.

This is a very good article, with a good historical overview and an objective assessment, advocating Esperanto in a realistic way without hype and cultism, and even with his particular interest as a man of the left.

Benton provides a capsule summary of Zamenhof and of the Esperanto movement's history and present status, then launches into the history of the proletarian Esperanto movement and the hostility engendered in reaction to the various causes that embraced Esperanto. Benton mentions the leading international organization, Sennacieca Asocio Tutmonda (World Anationalist Association, "SAT" for short), its erstwhile collaboration with the USSR, the eventual Stalinist break with SAT, and the breakaway pro-Moscow Internacio de Proletaj Esperantistoj (International of Proletarian Esperantists).

Benton then covers the persecution of Esperantists by the Nazis and the Stalin regime and its eventual satellite regimes. (Esperanto had a significant presence before the Great Purges. I do not recall the Communist International ever endorsing Esperanto''s rival Ido, though I do remember Ido was part of the mix.) With de-Stalinization, the Esperanto movement was revived in the Soviet bloc, and its association there with the "peace movement" was a vehicle for Esperanto to thrive.

Benton also outlines the history of Esperanto in China, its early association with anarchism and communism. He mentions also the Japanese woman Hasegawa Teru (known by the Esperanto pseudonym "Verda Majo" = Green May) who was to join with the Chinese against Japanese aggression. In Maoist China, Esperanto was initially suppressed, then tolerated, then later, even while under suspicion during the Cultural Revolution, was widely used by the regime for Maoist propaganda. The Esperanto movement thrived in the post-Mao era, but its strength has vacillated.

Finally, Benton tackles the future prospects of Esperanto, with respect to the global changes that have transpired since its early days and what this means for the role and fate of the language -- in recent decades the effects of the fall of the Soviet bloc, the decreased reliance on traditional Esperantist membership organizations, and the rise of online communication. Esperanto thrives in the digital age, and the values it represents are as relevant as ever.


2014-10-20

Utopia in Four Movements revisited

Utopia in Four Movements was a multimedia "live documentary" by Sam Green and Dave Cerf. It was presented at various venues around the country and abroad, including the American Film Institute's Silverdocs Documentary Festival in Silver Spring, Maryland (just outside of Washington, DC) on June 26, 2010. (See my blog entry on this performance.) This "live documentary" included film clips, narration, and live music. Is there any video of one of these performances as a whole? I do not know. Here are a few fragments on video.

                Utopia en 4 Movimientos. Segunda presentacion
Utopia en 4 Movimientos. Segunda presentacion from AMBULANTE on Vimeo.

   Utopia, Part 3  1/2 - 2/2: The World's Largest Shopping Mall

2014-07-07

George Psalmanazar revisited

Mi jam blogis pri George Psalmanazar. I already blogged about George Psalmanazar in Esperanto. Here is an interesting article on the famous charlatan:

Made in Taiwan?: An Eighteenth-Century Frenchman’s Fictional Formosa by Benjamin Breen, The Appendix, Vol. 1, no. 4, October 2013.

This is a popular article with some impressive illustrations. Breen links Psalmanazar's fabrications to contemporaneous imaginary vojages of Jonathan Swift and others, including fictions passed off as fact, and to the ideological themes of the day. Apparently Psalmanazar "inspired" Swift. At the end, there is a reference to Jorge Luis Borges' story "Pierre Menard".

Breen also published a scholarly article:

Breen, Benjamin. "No Man Is an Island: Early Modern Globalization, Knowledge Networks, and George Psalmanazar’s Formosa," Journal of Early Modern History 17 (2013) 391-417.

From the abstract:
The divergence between Psalmanazar’s personal credibility and the longevity of his invented facts sheds light on the nature of evidence and information networks in early modern globalization. This episode highlights the imperfect and contested nature of early modern communication network.
There is a fantastic computerized reconstruction of early modern knowledge networks:

Mapping the Republic of Letters: Electronic Enlightenment Correspondence Visualization

This is the most comprehensive work on Psalmanazar:

Keevak, Michael. The Pretended Asian: George Psalmanazar's Eighteenth-Century Formosan Hoax. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2004.

2012-12-19

Sam Green's 'Utopia in Four Movements' revisited


by Stephen Squibb; Idiom; October 13, 2010

This is an old review but an interesting one. The reviewer is sharply critical but insightful in dissecting the logic of Green's live documentary  Utopia in Four Movements as well as his earlier documentary The Weather Underground.  Read for yourself.



2011-06-05

Sam Green, Utopia, Esperanto, Adorno

Here is a review of Sam Green's Utopia in Four Movements that I haven't seen before and that presents something different as well:

Hope Against Hope: Utopia in Four Movements by Andrew Lison, Dossier, May 14, 2009.

You don't often see Adorno's name juxtaposed to Esperanto, but the theme is failed utopian dreams and their monstrous side. It's a thoughtful review. I can't help but quip, though: there is Esperanto after Auschwitz.

2011-02-05

Interview about Utopia in Four Movements

Interview about Utopia in Four Movements
Chuck Smith
Transparent Language Esperanto Blog, 6 December 2010

Sam Green is no stranger to his blog. I first blogged about this live documentary when it was shown in the Washington metropolitan area. The show is still on the road, and here is an interview about it.

2010-06-30

Utopia in Four Movements

Utopia in Four Movements is a "live documentary" by Sam Green and Dave Cerf. It was presented at the American Film Institute's Silverdocs Documentary Festival in Silver Spring, Maryland (just outside of Washington, DC) on June 26, 2010. This "live documentary" was a multimedia presentation. The filmmaker Sam Green, in the flesh, narrated the film with live background music provided by a trio called The Quavers, with Dave Cerf masterminding the sound. So this is not (yet) a standalone documentary film.

The four utopias are (1) Esperanto, (2) revolution, (3) shopping malls, (4) forensic anthropology. The general theme undergirding all the "utopias" is the frustrated dream of an egalitarian society. Esperanto is not only the first utopia of the film but in a sense its anchor.

Esperanto was presented with quite a bit of photographic footage originating prior to World War II and film footage of contemporary Esperantists from a wide range of nationalities at world congresses. As most of my face-to-face contact is with American Esperantists, I rarely get the full impact of oral communication across language barriers. All this was quite inspiring and swelled me with pride in being an Esperantist.

I was quite stunned to see film footage of Zamenhof himself, which I didn't know existed. I wish we could get hold of this and preserve it in a usable form ourselves. I inquired afterward and was told it came from a French newsreel and was difficult to acquire. Sam Green was rather pressed for time, so I didn't get a chance to pursue the matter, but we should inquire as to the details and availability of this footage.

Including myself, I identified three Esperantists in the audience. At the end of the Q & A, Jim Ryan, sporting an Esperanto T-shirt, was called upon to say a few words about Esperanto and the presence of the local society. Afterwards, he handed out flyers to exiting attendees.

It was fun for me, and good for Esperanto, unless you think a photo of Mao's red book in Esperanto might give people the wrong idea. (I'm told it's not the red book but Mao's Elektitaj Verkoj Vol. I [Selected Works].)

Evaluation of the whole film requires more in-depth analysis. I think the strength of the relationship between the overall point made about the difference between the perspectives of the early 20th century and now, and the fragments of historical information provided, particularly about revolutionary movements, could be questioned, for the actual examples given could serve to undermine the general argument. I brought this up with Sam Green, who admitted the problem. Regardless, we get a rather impressive exposition of Esperanto, both of its explosive growth and presence prior to the Second World War, and its persistence up to the present time.

If you can read Esperanto, you will see from the Libera Folio blog that some Esperantists were put off by the film. I don't know much Sam Green varies his narrative at each showing, but I don't see him depicting Esperanto as a noble failure. If anything, he demonstrates the resilience of the Esperanto movement, and by showing Esperanto as a living language, in which people of all nations participate, he releases Esperanto from being held hostage to finvenkismo [final victory of Esperanto as an international auxiliary language]. His depiction of Esperanto conferences reflects his 1000-points-of-light theme about patches of limited progress in the face of the smashing of big dreams about a comprehensive social overhaul.

Sam Green's aim, as he has stated in public and to me personally, was to paint a poetic rather than historically precise portrayal of any of these 'utopias'. The question remains as to whether people would get the general gist of his contrast between the big dreams of a century ago (and up through the 1960s) and the dismal prospects of today, or whether they would scrutinize with critical precision the details of what was being presented and question its logic. I would hate to see the '60s summed up by the Brinks bank robbery and the Cultural Revolution. I don't recall whether I saw Green's documentary on The Weather Underground on PBS. It's quite possible, but then I also saw the film the Weather Underground itself made underground in the '70s, and my memory is blurring. As I told Green after the film, people might get the wrong idea from the examples he chose, a possibility he admitted. But you can see how his associative thinking worked: big dreams turned into disasters, Viennese ex-socialist inventing the American shopping mall, ex-Maoist becoming mega-mall developer, Cuba trying to keep the dream alive, American fugitive and expatriate in Cuba keeping the dream alive, Mao's book in Esperanto. It's a chain of associative connections which are not logical from the standpoint of serious historiography, but which, if not scrutinized too closely, support Green's imaginative construct.

I'm also guessing that Green, who is evidently too young to remember the '60s, might be over-romanticizing the wrong things, or more accurately, might have internalized a crude opposition between utopia and disaster, taking each as frozen images of political movements to place in opposition to one another, which is no way of understanding real history. I hope he doesn't wear a Che T-shirt. I couldn't stand that stuff 40 years ago.

And now, a couple paragraphs for non-anglophone Esperantists, followed by a list of links.

Krom la anglalingvaj retpaĝoj, rigardu Utopio en kvar movimentoj ĉe Verda Filmejo. En la blogo Libera Folio vi trovos plurajn plendaĉojn pri la filmo, kelkajn defendojn, kaj plurajn kromdiskutojn. Bazita de la ĵusa specifa prezento en Silver Spring, mi ne gajnis impreson pri Esperanto similan al tio de tiuj kiuj reagis negative. Ŝajnas al mi, ke la ĝenerala bildo pri Esperanto estas pozitiva. Se oni atentos detalojn, eble oni perceptus alimaniere, sed neniu povas certi pri reago de novulo kiu antaŭe sciis nenion pri Esperanto.

Eble ekzistas problemo pli ĝenerala, t.e. nostalgio pri utopioj kiujn oni funebras kiel malrealismajn. La ŝlosila difekto--aŭ manko de logiko kaj konsekvenceco--estas en la dua parto de la filmo, pri revolucio--kies mesaĝo finfine malkoheras kiel rezulto de la ekzemploj elektitaj.

Links / Retligoj:

Utopia in Four Movements

Sam Green

American Film Institute's Silverdocs Documentary Festival

Silverdocs: A conversation with Utopia in 4 Movements Director Sam Green

Utopia in Four Movements | San Francisco Jewish Film Festival

Sam Green @ YouTube:

Sam Green: Hoping for the Best

Sam Green - Utopia in Four Movements

SFIFF53 Video Scoop Friday April 30
Utopio en kvar movimentoj

Filmo pri utopio ignoras la realan Esperantujon