Showing posts with label M.S. Rakitski. Show all posts
Showing posts with label M.S. Rakitski. Show all posts

2012-08-01

M.S. Rakitski & la frua debato pri originala literaturo en Esperanto

Mi jam afiŝis pri M.S. Rakitski anglalingve. Tiuokaze la informaro devenis el Enkonduko en la Originalan Literaturon de Esperanto de William Auld. Nu, oni trovos tiun aferon kun pluaj detaloj en mallonga artikolo:

“La radikoj de nia literaturo” (1993) de William Auld

Raktiski faris en 1901 radikalan proponon instigi originalan beletran verkadon en Esperanto. Kurioze laŭ nia aktuala starpunkto, aliaj oponis tiun starpunkton. Legu la artikolon por eltrovi la rezonadon kaj problemaron de la afero.

2012-07-27

M.S. Rakitski pri originala literaturo en Esperanto (1901)

"I now dream that someday we will be able to collect and publish in our language a whole book of original literary products, written directly in the international language... I believe that one original work, even if not very good, is much more important and worthy of respect than the ten best translations of the best national writings, because only an original work is completely our own property, in form and also content. Only an original work can prove to the world that our language is something really alive."

— M.S. Rakitski, Lingvo Internacia, August 1901; quoted in William Auld, Enkonduko en la Originalan Literaturon de Esperanto, p. 15.

This is a translation from Auld's book in Esperanto on the history of original Esperanto literature, well worth reading. (I just re-read it after 25 years). This translated quote appears in Chapter 9, The Literary Scene, of Don Harlow's The Esperanto Book, an introduction to Esperanto literature for English-readers.  Re-reading Auld is the first I remember learning of Rakitski. There are other references to him and I may reference more of him. Not everyone believed in the priority of original literature, in 1901 when Esperanto was in its infancy or decades later, so this is historically noteworthy.

This quote was lifted for one intervention in an argument on an unrelated subject with a reactionary nutjob: Can Literature Survive Without Spirituality?