Showing posts with label kritika teorio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kritika teorio. Show all posts

2015-08-30

John Wilkins & irony (3): Adorno postscript

In my first post on this subject, I mentioned:

"Ironic Serif: A Brief History of Typographic Snark and the Failed Crusade for an Irony Mark" by Maria Popova (Brain Pickings)

As it happens, Popova wrote another piece on punctuation concerning an author who commands a great deal of my attention:

Theodor Adorno on the Art of Punctuation by Maria Popova (Brain Pickings)

Adorno took punctuation very seriously, as evidenced by an essay I have not seen: “Punctuation Marks.”
A translation of it by Shierry Weber Nicholsen was first published in the Summer 1990 issue of the poetry journal The Antioch Review and later included in Jennifer DeVere Brody’s altogether excellent Punctuation: Art, Politics, and Play (public library), the essay explores the “definitive physiognomic status” of each punctuation mark, its uses and abuses in the hands of writers, and how punctuation helps shed light on the relationship between language and music which, as we know, worked in tandem to help humanity evolve.

Popova proceeds to detail Adorno's views. Note that Adorno vehemently objected to punctuating ironic remarks. (Note also that she links to her article on the ironic serif.)

Note that Adorno's essay is discussed in Brody’s Punctuation: Art, Politics, and Play, but it is not reprinted there. Adorno's essay was collected in book form here:

Adorno, Theodor W. “Punctuation Marks,” in Notes to Literature; Volume One, edited by Rolf Tiedemann, translated by Shierry Weber Nicholsen (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), pp. 91-97.

2013-09-02

Konsumismo de protestado

Konsumebla kontestado por la mezaj klasoj de Pierre RIMBERT, Le Monde Diplomatique en Esperanto, majo 2009.

Jen malnova artikolo pri la alimondisma movado, sed ĝi restas interesa pro la koncepto de varigo kaj mezklasigo de kontraŭkapitalismaj, kontraŭsistemaj movadoj. Tio implicas ankaŭ la asimiladon de socia kritiko kaj socia teorio al la kulturindustrio (termino de Theodor Adorno).

Car mi jam blogis pri Paul Nizan, mi citas la jenan referencon, ne nepre por konsenti:

Kiel signo de intelekta distingiĝo, la kapablo supermeti la poron kaj kontraŭon, kontraŭmeti kleran bibliografion (prefere la sian) al politika argumento, eĉ „pensi kontraŭ sin mem”, montras la malemon de parto de la mezaj klasoj partopreni en la tranĉeoj de la socia milito se ne temas pri iliaj propraj interesoj. Tiu sinteno, samtempe kun la emo engaĝiĝi por malproksimaj kaj malavaraj aferoj, troviĝas aparte enradikiĝinta ĉe la artistoj aŭ ĉe la universitatanoj, kiujn Paul Nizan denuncis en 1932 en La gardhundoj.
Krom afiŝoj ĉi-bloge, vidu ankaŭ:

Misio de la Filozofo de Paul Nizan

2013-05-04

André Breton, Ramón Llull, & surrealism revisited

"Lully is surrealist in definition." — André Breton

This is one item in a list of persons characterized as surrealist in a particular way. This can be found in Breton's "What is Surrealism?", a lecture in Brussels on 1 June 1934. Breton here recapitulates what he wrote in the first Manifesto of Surrealism of 1924. I just realized that I've already blogged about this.

But here is an additional reference, a post on Breton's penchant for composing lists:

Alphabet of the Magnetic Field: Breton Lists his Surrealists, March 10, 2013.

Breton was indeed were very adept at making lists and canonizing various figures on the basis of a perceived common characteristic conducive to surrealist preoccupations, a practice predicated on an arbitrary, authoritarian, and intellectually undisciplined mode of thinking. This surrealist taxonomic imperative is sometimes useful in archiving the curiosa of the past, but it is ultimately simple-minded, unsystematic, self-indulgent, and dogmatic, as the organized surrealist movement ultimately was. The Chicago surrealists were even worse than Breton, but they did dredge up some interesting material in their anthologies. Surrealism, as I've written elsewhere  (no revelation there), thrived on juxtapositions and novel combinations, hence my relating it to the ars combinatoria. List-making doesn't quite measure up even to that, but there is implied taxonomy in making lists, and hence that too relates to the topic.

See also my essay Walter Benjamin and Ars Combinatoria.  Also "Surrealism: The Last Snapshot of the European Intelligentsia" by Walter Benjamin, 1929.

2013-02-21

Transhumanism in the 1930s: Szathmári, Bernal, Horkheimer

While reviewing and researching Sándor Szathmári's classic Voyage to Kazohinia last year, I revisited and recognized the importance of this article:

Schäfer, Wolf. "Stranded at the Crossroads of Dehumanization: John Desmond Bernal and Max Horkheimer," in On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives, edited by Seyla Benhabib, Wolfgang Bonß, and John McCole (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993) pp. 153-183.

Here is what I wrote on 28 December 2005 upon first reading this essay:

This is right in keeping with a major concern: i.e. the incapacity of the Frankfurt School to engage intelligently the natural sciences, an inadequacy yet to be repaired. Schafer is pointed in his diagnosis of how the split between the "two cultures" (anyone still remember C.P. Snow?) could not be more sharply manifested than in the fundamental orientation of these two individuals.

What is essential to understand here is not only an absolute antithesis between Bernal and Horkheimer II, but the fact that both were products of two cultures--science and humanistic--that did not intersect or understand one another. (170-1)

Schafer quotes Horkheimer's The Eclipse of Reason (p. 75) to point up his hopeless position:
"that the division of all human truth into science and humanities is itself a social product that was hypostatized by the organization of the universities and ultimately by some philosophical schools, particularly those of Rickert and Max Weber. The so-called practical world has no place for truth, and therefore splits it to conform it to its own image: the physical sciences are endowed with so-called objectivity, but emptied of human content; the humanities preserve the human content, but only as ideology, at the expense of truth."
Schafer's evaluation of Horkheimer's position is not kind:
"If one could regard this statement itself as true and as not being warped by ideology, then the professional fractalization of truth could be cured and made whole and healthy again by a new social product, perhaps by reorganizing the universities and our intellectual life according to the gospel of some holistic philosophical school. False objectivity and true ideology could be overcome; truths without human content could be rehumanized; and truths with untruthful human content could be corrected. But the view of Horkheimer II cannot be true since it was produced inside the humanities--those branches of learning that preserve the human content . . . as ideology." Horkheimer must situate his own thinking in this ideological context. We may as well conclude, therefore, that Horkheimer II fell victim to his own deconstruction of occidental reason--that he is part of the problem and not of the solution." [172-3]
Schafer also criticizes Bernal, but then he returns to the shortcomings of critical theory:
"But neither early, middle, nor current critical theory has paid, or is paying, enough attention to the sciences and technologies that feed into and shape the natural half of human history. The dreams, fantasies, and projects of our technoscientific culture thrive with very little or no internal technocritique that is not purely technical; our most eloquent technocritics are often crudely antitechnological; and relevant academic fields, like the professional history and sociology of science and technology, care more about their own problems and research fronts than about society at the crossroads into the future." [173]
I would have phrased this differently. The key here is the incompetence of the humanistic critics of science and technology, not their willingness to criticize.

Schafer concludes with what the universities might and could do to bridge the divide, but specialization is so firmly entrenched there are no signs of any remediation.

So in the end this essay is a cry of alarm about the "two cultures", rather than the specific shortcomings of Horkheimer's philosophical understanding of the natural sciences. But as far as he goes, I'm in near complete agreement.
Returning to this essay last year, I was not so interested in Horkheimer's shortcomings as I was in Bernal's and in a key contraposition in 20th-century intellectual history that the Horkheimer-Bernal juxtaposition exemplifies.

Though Horkheimer was on the warpath against positivism, as were his philosophical colleagues, it should be noted that the logical positivists that had recently come into prominence were on the left.  Bernal, a scientist and eventually a pioneer historiographer of science, himself became a Communist, I don't know when offhand. In question here is Bernal's 1929 work The World, the Flesh, and the Devil, in which Bernal projects the transcendence of human physical existence, presenting a transhumanist vision which can readily be classified as a precursor of Szathmári's 1964 novella Maŝinmondo (Machine World).

For an extensive overview of this theme, see: Christopher Coenen, "Utopian Aspects of the Debate on Converging Technologies"; Pre-Print: 13.11.2007.

One man's utopia is another man's dystopia. The basic themes of transhumanism, while still being debated, are old now, but there was a time when they were fresh, spanning a half-century from Wells to Orwell. Szathmári merits induction into the utopian/dystopian/transhumanist Hall of Fame as one of its central figures.

In the critical literature on Szathmári in Esperanto there are some incisive critiques of the philosophical assumptions underlying Kazohinia. While there exists in Esperanto a bit of material and references here and there to the philosophers of the Frankfurt School and related thinkers, no one has yet staged a confrontation of Critical Theory and Szathmári's work. The Frankfurt theorists drew on the irrationalist philosophical heritage but always with the goal of preserving Reason, which they saw as degraded by positivism. There are still lessons to be learned from the warring dichotomies of the past century.

2012-12-15

Nikolao Gudskov pri antikva-greka filozofio

La ofte trovata frenezeco en Esperantujo troviĝas ankaŭ ne malofte inter tiuj esperantistoj kiuj ankaŭ ambicias roli kiel filozofoj. Estas diversspecaj tipoj de filozofia literaturo en Esperanto: tradukoj, popolklerigaj verkoj, historiaj resumoj, kaj originalaj verkoj. Aliokaze mi komentos pri la tuta gamo. Ĉi-foje mi reliefigas analizan historian originalan verkon, kiu estas vere leginda:

Gudskov, Nikolao. Kiel la Homo Ekis Pensi: Eseoj pri la Helena Filozofio. Moskvo: Impeto, 2012.

Ĉi estas tiom serioza, perspektiva, detala pritrakto de la temo, ke mi inkluzivas ĝin en mia nova anglalingva bibliografio interalie pri la sociologio de antikva-greka filozofio:

Greek Philosophy, the Scientific Revolution, Abstraction, Phenomenology, & the Money Economy: Selected Bibliography 
[Greka filozofio, la scienca revolucio, abstraktado, fenomenologio, & monekonomio: elektita bibliografio]

Jen rilata eseo de Gudskov:

Ĉu Taleso estis la unua, aŭ forgesitaj “Sepoj”?, Teleskopo, #1, 2009

Oni pretendas nuntempe pensi tutmonde pri filozofio, sed fakte tio estas ideologia trompo laŭ modo tutmondiga/novliberalisma/postmodernisma. La interagado de lingvosferaj, naciaj, skolaj kaj ideologiaj intelektaj tradicioj restas problemo ne adekvate ekzamenata. Ĉi tio estas pensenda afero en la krokodila makrosocio kaj inter la esperantista intelektularo.

En la verko de Gudskov percepteblas la plej bona influo de la sovetia historiografio de filozofio, kiu estas preskaŭ tute nekonata kaj ne facile konebla en Usono kaj ŝajne estas forigita el la historia memoro. Perspektivo el historia materiismo estas fakte tre utila kontribuo al kompreno de la historio de filozofio kaj ne estas perspektivo el kiu oni instruas filozofion en Usono. (La eroj kaj aŭtoroj en mia menciita anglalingva bibliografio ne estas vaste konataj.)  Do eble taŭgas ke Esperanto ĉi-kaze estu medio ne nur de interlingva kaj internacia sed ankaŭ de intertradicia komunikado.

2012-09-25

G. M. Tamás pri dekstrisma putro en Hungario

G. M. Tamás ne estas vaste konata en la anglofona mondo, sed pluraj eseoj kaj intervjuoj estas haveblaj en la angla. Plej gravas lia teorio de postfaŝismo, kiu aplikeblas vaste, ankaŭ pri Usono. Troveblas rekoneblaj trajtoj: faŝismigo de socio kadre de formala demokrata politika strukturo kaj historia renverso--malvastigo de civitaneco kaj legitimeco de homrajtoj.  Nu, jen artikolo en Esperanto, pri Hungario specife:

Hungario, la laboratorio de nova dekstrularo
 Le Monde Diplomatique en Esperanto, 1a februaro 2012

2012-06-18

Humphrey Tonkin on Esperanto & literary translation / pri literatura tradukado

Kvankam Humphrey Tonkin estas bone konata ĉe mi, kiel en la tuta Esperantujo, la amplekso de lia verkaro evidente ne estas universale konata. Ekzemple, ĉi tiun rimarkindan eseon mi ĵus eltrovis:

The Semantics of Invention: Translation into Esperanto
Humphrey Tonkin
University Professors Program of Boston University
Literary Translation Seminar
February 22, 2008

Eĉ la pli flankaj informoj de ĉi tiu eseo estas notindaj. Ekz. mi lernis ion novan pri la iama maldekstra esperantisto kaj sindikatmovadano Mark Starr, kiu transdonis al Humphrey tradukon de Winnie-the-Pooh (Winnie-la-Pu) fare de Ivy Kellerman Reed.

Pro la nekontentiga kvalito, Humphrey retradukis ĝin cele al sukcesa eldonigo de eminenta eldonisto. Li priskribas la procezon kaj problemaron de tradukado kaj studadon de diversaj tradukoj (inkluzive la latinan, kiun mi memoras, ĉar latinista amiko mia konis ĝin).

Humphrey citas Umberto Eco, sed eĉ pli interese, li referencas la lingvajn konceptojn de Walter Benjamin (amiko de Theodor W. Adono kaj iama kunlaboranto kun la Frankfurta Skolo de kritika teorio).

Humphrey resumas la tradukan programon de Zamenhof kaj pritraktas la specialajn problemojn de Shakespeare, kaj ankaŭ la statuson de Shakespeare en diversaj lingvokomunumoj, kiel universalan aŭtoron. Zamenhof tradukis Hamleton ne el la originala sed el traduko, en la plej frua periodo kiam Esperanto estis novbakita. Humphrey konsideras la problemojn de semantiko en tiu stato, kaj ĝenerale en multlingva kunteksto. Zamenhof bazis sian traduklaboron sur komuna eŭroplingva semantiko, tiel sur artefarita pasinteco, kaj stile modelis germane, ne latinide. (Humphrey atentigas, ke aliaj prozodiaj modeloj estis enkondukitaj laŭ pola, itala, ĉina, japana modeloj, ekz.)

Plu diskutataj estas leksikaj kaj sintaksaj rimedoj en Esperanto. Ĉiuj povas vidi en Esperanto laŭplaĉe diversajn lingvajn tipojn. Sekvaj eksperimentoj kaj evoluaĵoj fare de sekvaj esperantistaj verkistoj estas menciitaj.

Esperanto estas unika; la malgranda kvanto de denaskaj parolantoj malmulte influas la ĝeneralan lingvouzon. Unulingva kaj purisma lingvistika perspektivo de lingvoj ne taŭgas ĉi-rilate.

Humphrey konsideras celojn de tradukoj. Shakespeare denove servas kiel ekzemplo. Humphrey komparas la tradukojn de Zamenhof kaj de L. N. M. Newell. Humphrey taksas la tradukon de Newell, kiu celis tekstan fidelecon, malpli sukcesa ol Zamenhof laŭ drameca vidpunkto. Li rakontas propran problemaron en sia tradukado de Henry V de Shakespeare. (Li tradukis ankaŭ A Winter's Tale.) Humphrey montras la problemaron per traduko de ĉerpaĵo el Moll Flanders de Daniel Defoe.

Tradukado el Esperanto ankaŭ alportas malfacilaĵojn, en poezio eĉ eble nesolveblajn. Humphrey tradukis anglalingven la du memuarojn de Tivadar Soros (Teodoro Ŝvarc).

Fine, Humphrey detaligas siajn rimedojn por traduko de Winnie-la-Pu.

2011-08-13

Ars combinatoria in contemporary art & literary theory & practice

Here is a sampling of recent projects in the visual arts, literary creation, literary and cultural theory incorporating ideas from the legacy of the ars combinatoria.

Jen kolekteto de lastatempaj projektoj de arto, literaturo, kaj kulturteorio (per legaĵoj anglalingvaj) kiuj utiligas la intelektan heredaĵon de ars combinatoria.

Orderly disorder: post-human creativity
Dr. Rolf Hughes

On the 'death of the author', 'metacreation', emergence, creativity, complexity. Opposes the Romantic, creative individual to the ars combinatoria of these post-humanist conceptions.

Spring Cleaning: from Bad to Rotten Words Project
Lulú De Panbehchi
Ars Combinatoria Project, Dr. Artur Matuck
May 5th, 2009

Combining Llull, Oulipo, Lyotard, et al in the Internet environment.

On the Dissolution Through Sameness in Emptiness In: Decodierung:Recodierung, Triton Verlag Wien, 2000.
Toni Kleinlercher

On literary forms inspired by Llull, Leibniz, etc.

Between a Creative Scotland and a Cultural Scotland: Pat Kane chapter for 'Radical Scotland: Arguments for Self-Determination
Thoughtland (blog), 11 March 2011

On the question of "creative industries" in Scottish cultural policy. The ideas of Paulo Virno are referenced, apparently pertaining to the vacillation between indeterminate, chaotic nature of human experience and the retreat to stereotypical formulae, i.e. "reaction-halting behaviours, obsessive tics, the drastic impoverishments of the ars combinatoria".

Ars Combinatoria at Transmediale

Jonathan Gray, 7 February, 2011

Ars Combinatoria (Transmediale)

Inspired by Leibniz, "The Ars Combinatoria project is about creating new works with public domain or openly licensed images, sounds and texts. it was launched at Transmediale in 2011 by Jonathan Gray and Adam Green."

Leibniz’s Funny Thought
Jonathan Gray, 30 August, 2009

Inspired by Leibiz's conception of "knowledge theater". ". . . Leibniz’s idea for a ‘new sort of exhibition’ is laid out in a short piece from 1695 called Drôle de Pensée, or ‘a funny thought’, which was written after he saw a machine which ‘walked on water’ at an exhibition in Paris."

Ars Combinatoria
Jens Hoffmann

On the German artist John Bock.

2011-06-05

Gramsci, language, Esperanto

In the late 1980s I investigated Antonio Gramsci's views on language including his hostility to the Esperanto movement. On a totally different track, encountering the Gramsci boom in the '90s I developed serious reservations about the transference of Gramsci's notion of organic intellectuals to contemporary circumstances. All of my suspicions were confirmed. I know I've mentioned this here and there but I don't recall writing anything systematic about it. But here are a couple short commentaries:

Antonio Gramsci, Organic Intellectuals, and the Division of Labor 

Marxism & Totality & Gramsci & Della Volpe
None of this touches on Gramsci's view of language, but it does suggest my suspicion of organicism. It might relate to Gramsci's treating Esperanto as anathema. I just chanced upon this article:

Gunster, Shane. "Gramsci’s Linguistic Turn: Critical Theory, Vernacular Materialism and the Grammar of Revolution" [Review of Ives, Peter. 2004. Gramsci’s Politics of Language: Engaging the Bakhtin Circle and the Frankfurt School. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.], Topia 13, pp. 165-168.

Gunster begins in a most unconvincing fashion:
Conceived in linguistic terms, then, the construction of a hegemonic cultural formation involves the molecular translation of diverse, immanent communicative practices into a coherent and (relatively) unified grammatical structure. Gramsci contrasts the progressive, organic character of this process to regressive forms of cultural domination that involve the external imposition of arbitrary, fixed linguistic regimes that serve to displace or repress, rather than integrate, indigenous patterns of language. Hence, for example, his fierce opposition to the naive, technocratic utopianism of those socialists and communists who advocated Esperanto as a means of artificially overcoming the communicative barriers that slowed the fashioning of a unified class consciousness among workers and peasants in different parts of Italy.
Clearly, Gunster  understands Esperanto no better than Gramsci did, or why the voluntaristic internationalism of proletarian Esperantists would be an imposition but national cultural unification is not. The balance of the review is not illuminating about any of the ideas discussed. I cannot draw any conclusions about Ives based on Gunster's useless review.

2011-06-04

Adorno & Esperanto? : phonetics, photograph, cinema, phonograph as universal languages

Some interesting metaphorical history here.

For the Record: Adorno on Music in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility
Thomas Y. Levin
October, Vol. 55. (Winter, 1990), pp. 23-47.

. . . particularly on pp. 35-38, where Esperanto is discussed. See the original text for illustrations.

At first glance there is a striking similarity between Adorno's evocation of a post-lapsarian utopia and the universal language topos that accompanied early cinema. [27] The parallel logic in what one could call the Esperantist conception of the cinema is evident, for example, in D. W. Griffith's claim in a 1921 interview that "A picture is the universal symbol, and a picture that moves is a universal language. Moving pictures, someone suggests, 'might have saved the situation when the Tower of Babel was built.' " [28] Just as cinema was heralded as a transparent, unproblematically accessible (because visual) alternative to national languages, an analogous discourse of democratization and univocal, natural signs accompanied the prehistory and invention of the phonograph. During the first half of the nineteenth century, phonography—defined in the OED as "a system of phonetic shorthand invented by Isaac Pitman in 1837"—was heralded as a "natural method of writing" [29] and was arduously defended by worker's groups as a means of making writing more widely accessible. [30] In the same vein, the "phonautographe," invented by Léon Scott de Martinville in 1857, was an attempt to produce, as the machine's subtitle explained, an "Apparatus for the Self-Registering of the Vibrations of Sound." The resulting "natural stenography" would be, according to the title of Scott's book on the subject, sound writing itself. [31] Illiteracy would thus be eliminated by substituting hearing and speaking for reading and writing. Indeed, one of the most popular uses of the early phonographs—which, one should recall, could both play and record—was acoustic correspondence. The "phono-post" speaking postcards, which one recorded and sent through the mails, made writing superfluous, a fact stressed by advertisements that invited potential users to drop their dictionaries and "Speak! Don't write any more! Listen!"

Unlike the visual Esperanto of the cinema, however, the possibility of universal language held out by the gramophone is just that: only a possibility, a hope. While the traces of the gramophone are just as indexical as the cinematic signifiers, they are not, as Adorno is careful to point out, readily intelligible like photographs. Rather, they are both indexical and enigmatic. In this regard they can claim both of the contradictory qualities of the hieroglyph: "universal" and "immediate" by virtue of their "natural," necessary relation of sign to referent, and also esoteric, recondite and requiring decoding, due to their surface inaccessibility. [32] Phonograph records are, to quote an astonishing early anticipation of Adorno's techno-cryptogrammic characterization, "cabalistic photographs [by means of which] sound can outlive itself, leave a posthumous trace, but in the form of hieroglyphs which not everyone can decipher." [33] Despite their shared millenarian formulations, the universal language rhetoric accompanying early cinema is thus far indeed from the post-Babelian figure employed by Adorno in his recuperation of gramophonic reification by means of what is almost a theology of indexicality. The latter must be located, rather, in a very different tradition: the hieroglyphics of nature articulated in German romanticism and, in particular, as mediated by Walter Benjamin.

___
27. As Miriam Hansen has pointed out, this metaphor of universal language, which was "used by journalists, intellectuals, social workers, clergy, producers, and industrial apologists alike . . . drew on a variety of discourses (Enlightenment, nineteenth-century positivism, Protestant millennialism, the Esperanto movement, and the growing advertising industry) and oscillated accordingly between utopian and totalitarian impulses" (Miriam Hansen, "The Hieroglyph and the Whore: D. W. Griffith's Intolerance," The South Atlantic Quarterly 88 (Spring 1989), p. 362. For more on the universal language discourse in early cinema, see also Hansen's "Universal Language and Democratic Culture: Myths of Origin in Early American Cinema," in Myth and Enlightenment in American Literature: In Honor of Hans-joachim Lang, ed. Dieter Meindl, et al. (Erlangen: Universitätsbund Erlagen-Nürenberg, 1985), pp. 321 -51.

28. D. W. Griffith, "Innovations and Expectations," in Focus on Griffith, ed. Harry M. Geduld (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1971), p. 56.

29. See Pitman's 1840 treatise, Phonography; or, Writing by Sound; Being a Natural Method of Writing, Applicable to all Languages, and a Complete System of Shorthand (London: S. Bagster & Sons, 1840).

30. This accounts for its appearance as a topic of debate at the 1867 congress of the International Worker's Association in Lausanne, a discussion that is summarized in G. Duveau, La Pensée ouvrière sur l'éducation pendant la Révolution et le Second Empire (Paris: Domat-Montchrestien, 1947), pp.115- 16.

31. Edouard-Leon Scott de Martinville, Le Problème de la parole s'écrivant elle-même: La France, l'Amérique (Paris, 1878). Earlier Scott had published a study of stenography entitled Histoire de la Sténographie depuis les temps anciens jusgu'à nos jours (Paris: Ch. Tondeur, 1849).

32. As an early nineteenth-century scholar has pointed out, ancient hieroglyphs were also, in fact, phonographic: "Hieroglyphic characters are either ideographs, that is, representations of ideas, or phonographs, that is, representationsof sounds" (Hincks, On Hieroglyphics, cited in OED

33. Emile Gautier, Le Phonographe: son passé, son présent, son avenir (Paris: Ernest Flammarion, 1905), p. 28. The implication in Gautier's remark that some people might be able to "read" the gramophone record is curiously confirmed by the case of Tim Wilson, a thirty-three-year-old Englishman who made the rounds of British and American talk shows in 1985 demonstrating his particular ability to identify unlabeled records, ostensibly by reading the patterns of the grooves (DPA press release, October 1985).
OK, most of this will be impenetrable gobbledegook to most of you, though it fits in to my research interests. But note that the universal language idea became popular for the first time in the 19th century, and as a master metaphor persisted into the early 20th century. The popular universal interest in a universal language dovetails with various media, symbolic codes, notations, etc. that could function as "universal languages". Of course, people still use the word "Esperanto" neutrally, positively, or pejoratively in a metaphorical sense, but we're in a different era. I wonder if it was the 1930s that killed off this earlier sensibility, both metaphorically as well as literally.

2011-03-31

Kontraŭ simbolo

Simbola Kruelo

     k
t e o r i a
     n
     s
     c
     i
     o


  — Ralph Dumain, 1978

2008-10-08

Kritika Teorio en Esperanto

Temas precipe pri la t.n. Frankfurta Skolo, sed la termino "kritika teorio" uzeblas iom pli larĝe.

Jen miaj ĝeneralaj esperantologiaj gvidiloj konsulteblaj:

Esperanto Study Guide / Esperanto-Gvidilo

Esperanto & Laborista Movado / Esperanto & the Labor Movement

Jen miaj anglalingvaj gvidiloj pri la Frankfurta Skolo:

Theodor W. Adorno Study Guide

The Frankfurt School: Philosophy in Relation to Social Theory, Cultural Theory, Science, and Interdisciplinary Research. Phase 1: Horkheimer, Adorno, and Marcuse in the 1930s. Study Group Syllabus

Pri filozofia terminologio: Se vi serĉos retejon Enciklopedio Simpozio-n, vi trovos hazardajn menciojn de Adorno kaj aliaj. Ĝenerale, vi trovos ĉiaspecan filozofiajn terminojn kaj ideojn kiuj eventuale utilus al diskutado pri filozofiaj konceptoj. Mi ankaŭ posedas fotokopion de la Filozofia Vortaro de Stan Kamaryt de 1934, sed mi supozas ke oni trovus Enciklopedio-Simpozion sufiĉe utila por ĝeneralaj celoj.

Ankaŭ la Vikipedio enhavas filozofiajn erojn. Ekz. oni povis komenci plej ĝenerale per Filozofio - Vikipedio.

Por publika diskutado, ekzistas la ĝenerala grupo filozofio ­ yahoo-grupo. Estas ankaŭ diversaj maldekstraj grupoj.

Ĉi-bloge, alklaku unue temon Frankfurta Skolo. Kelkaj el la jenaj artikoloj ricevas apartajn blogerojn:

Arta partikulareco kaj Esperanto [pri teorio de Georg Lukàcs] de R. P. Nogueira

Komunika Etiko kaj Esperantismo de Helmut Welger

Derrida kaj Habermas pri terorismo de Giovanna BORRADORI, trad. Vilhelmo Lutermano

Derrida en dialogo pri terorismo

Habermas en dialogo pri terorismo

Cinika Racio Difinita de Peter Sloterdijk (traduko)

La Deziro Asfiksiata, Aŭ Pri Kiamaniere la Kultur-Industrio Detruas la Individuon de Bernard STIEGLER

De Kap-Redukto al Korpo-Ŝanĝo de Dany-Robert DUFOUR

Ĉu alternativo? La kritika penso ĉe la fino de la dudeka jarcento de Jurgo Alkasaro (1996)

Jürgen Habermas - Vikipedio

Fuĝo for de libereco - Vikipedio (laŭ Erich Fromm)

The Language of Democracy: Vernacular Or Esperanto? A Comparison between the Multiculturalist and Cosmopolitan Perspectives by Daniele Archibugi

Vidu ankaŭ blogeron pri: "Unpacking a Provencal Library" de Rosemary Lloyd, kiu referencas Walter Benjamin kaj Esperanton.

Unpacking a Provencal Library

Note: The title takes off from a well-known essay by German-Jewish philosopher and critic Walter Benjamin. Following the abstract are excerpts from the full text of the article. The archive in question is now to be found at the Lilly Library, Indiana University. It would be nice to locate, if possible, Aubanel's "Venus d'Arles" in Esperanto translation.

* * *

Lloyd, Rosemary. "Unpacking a provencal library. " Nineteenth-Century French Studies. 32.3-4 (Spring-Summer 2004): 332(14).

Abstract:

The recent acquisition of the library of the Aubanel family, whose best-known member was the poet, Theodore Aubanel, allows a study of the Felibrige movement, its friends, and its critics, through an analysis of the manuscript inscriptions. Of the library's 1,300 books and ten boxes of pamphlets, periodicals, newspapers, and academic bulletins, there are some six hundred inscriptions and manuscript insertions written in French, Provencal, Catalan, Italian, English, and Esperanto. Ranging form brief definitions to sonnets, from praise to provocation, they shed an unaccustomed light on the writers, presses, and preoccupations of nineteenth-century Provence. (RL)

* * *

"The Provencal library in question is that of the Aubanel family, and especially of Theodore Aubanel, whom Paul Valery once termed the only true Provencal poet, and who had been such a supportive companion of Stephane Mallarme during the grim time he spent as a teacher in the provinces, the dear friend to whom Mallarme would write sending kisses from his daughter Genevieve, then a toddler, to Aubanel's infant son Jean-de-la-Croix. (2) Aubanel was a member of the Felibrige, (3) the band of Provencal writers who in the second half of the nineteenth century, at a time when Paris was rapidly extending its linguistic and cultural hegemony, were struggling to preserve at least some aspects of their culture, in a bid whose most concrete trace can be round in the Museon Arletan in Arles, to which Frederic Mistral devoted the money he earned from his Nobel Prize. (4) But the members of the Felibrige were also attempting not just to preserve the Provencal language, but also to transform into a written language what until then had been largely a spoken language (at least since the middle ages). In 1855 they founded an almanac, L'Armana prouvencau, which is still published today and which reflects this intellectual, artistic, and political conviction of the importance of those non-French languages and cultures practiced within the hexagon."

* * *

"Approximately six hundred of the books and pamphlets, moreover, include manuscript additions, either in the form of inscriptions written directly on the volume, or in that of inserted letters or poems. (7) There are also, lamentably, several traces of authors or presses who simply resorted to a stamp--Hommage de l'auteur--truly the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. These envois and dedications suggest something of the writer's aspirations for his work (rarely, in this particularly masculine culture, her work--Marie Jenna and Adele Souchier are among the few exceptions). (8) Insofar as they indicate the level of attachment to the movement and its purposes, the inscriptions furnish a sense of an effervescent if somewhat heterogeneous fellowship, with links to many other groups who were trying to give prominence to what we now term less-studied languages, languages like Catalan and Welsh, Esperanto and Gaelic. The network of relationships such dedications sketch allows us, not just, as Robert Darnton has argued, to "inspect the furnishings" of a library-owner's mind (134), but more importantly to see the Felibrige movement, and indeed the clusters of such movements, from a perspective quite different from that provided by more conventional historical approaches."

* * *

"Written in French and Provencal, Catalan, Italian, English, and Esperanto, these manuscript insertions run the gamut of the genre of the inscription"

* * *

"And although there are no books inscribed by Mistral, there is a card from him, in his beautiful handwriting, and his 1909 Mirejo has an insert, a translation of Aubanel's "Venus d'Arles" into Esperanto. (27) Aubanel's poem, which is part of his collection Li Fiho d'Avignoun (The Girls of Avignon), is there in his handwriting with his translation into French."

2008-08-03

Kulturindustrio detruas

Kontribuaĵo al la teorio pri la amasa konsumado:

LA DEZIRO ASFIKSIATA, AŬ PRI KIAMANIERE LA KULTUR-INDUSTRIO DETRUAS LA INDIVIDUON
de Bernard STIEGLER
Le Monde Diplomatique en Esperanto
http://eo.mondediplo.com/article918.html

[RESUMO:] La superindustria kapitalismo disvolvis siajn teknikojn en tia grado ke milionoj da personoj ĉiutage samtempe kaptas la samajn televidajn, radiajn aŭ lud-terminalajn programerojn. La kultura konsumado, metode amasigata, gravas por la deziroj kaj konscioj. La iluzio pri la triumfo de la individuo stompiĝas, dum la minacoj preciziĝas kontraŭ la intelektaj, amaj kaj estetikaj kapabloj de la homaro.
Mi supozas, ke francdevenaj verkistoj citus unue francajn filozofojn, sed bedaŭrindas, se oni pensas pri la damaĝo instigita de la pseŭdomaldesktraj francaj filozofoj depost 1960, el kiuj la menciita Deleuze estas unu el la precipaj kulpuloj.

La koncepto "kulturindustrio" estas produkto de la Frankfurta Skolo kaj estis unue ellaborata de Theodor Adorno. Prefere legu el tiu skolo.

La eseo mencias la amikon de Adorno, Walter Benjamin, kies memmortigo en 1940 post malsukcesa peno eskapi la faŝistojn hantis Adorno-n dum la cetero de ties vivo.

Edward Bernays, kiu ekzamenis la psikologion de amasmanipulado kiu perfektiĝis en Usono, estas notinda.

Adorno lernis multe dum ekzilo en Usono. Lia takso tamen, ne estis tute negativa: li parolis favore pri siaj spertoj en Usono al germana aŭskultantaro (v. la libron Kritikaj Modeloj), frue en la 1960aj jaroj, mi kredas, sendube motivata de bezono kontraŭi la kontraŭusonajn antaujuĝojn de germana faŝismo (ekz. la nazia filozofo Heidegger).

Kurioza estas la cito de Husserl ĉi-teme. Sed pli bone la originala fenomenologio ol Deleuze & Guattari. La sekva analizo de libidina ekonomio ŝajnas al mi strangaĵo nekonvikiga.

Evidente la eseo respegulas la politikajn cirkonstancojn de Francio. Mi ne konas la aktualan kulturan nek la politikan staton de Francio. Sed la elekto de Sarkozy indikas degeneron, ĉu ne?

2008-08-02

Novliberalismo, genetika inĝenierado, Sloterdijk

La homo aliformigata de la merkatekonomio:

DE KAP-REDUKTO AL KORPO-ŜANĜO
de Dany-Robert DUFOUR
Le Monde Diplomatique en Esperanto

[RESUMO:] Ree «nova homo», jen tio, kion la merkato estas fabrikanta sub niaj okuloj. Detruante ian le formon, kiu prezentus limigon al la varo, la novliberala malreguligado kauzas efikojn en iuj kampoj. Ne nur en la ekonomia kampo. La homa psiko mem estas perturbata, emociegata. Deprimoj, identecaj krizoj, memmortigoj kaj perversaĵoj multobliĝas. En tia grado, ke la merkato ne plu volas la homan estaĵon tian, kia li estas. Helpe de klonado kaj genetika inĝenierio, ĝi de nun senhezite postulas la biologian aliformigadon de la homaro.
Krom la ŝlosila citaĵo el Marx, kaj mencioj de aliaj, mi atentigas jene:
Jam, kelkaj voĉoj lautiĝas eĉ meze de la intelektularo por bonvenigi la supozate bonan novaĵon pri la baldaŭa mutacio de la homo. Tute aparte la germana filozofo Peter Sloterdijk, kiu famiĝis, fine de 1999, en Germanio per sia prelego titolita Reguloj por la homa gregejo, ĉe faka kunveno dediĉita al Heidegger. Tiu prelego estigis grandan diskuton, interalie kun Jürgen Habermas. La diroj de tiu «maldekstra riĉano» ŝajnas signifaj je la maniero per kiu la nuna simbola malreguligado povas konfuzi la mensojn.

Nu, la unua apero de Sloterdijk en angla traduko estis la grava verko Kritiko de Cinika Racio. Jen la ŝlosila koncepto:

Cinika Racio Difinita
tradukita el angla traduko: What Is Cynical Reason? Peter Sloterdijk Explains.

Ĝi estas tre grava koncepto. Mi kredas, ke la kerna ekspliko pli gravas ol la cetera libro, en kiu troviĝas semoj de la posta degenero de Sloterdijk ĝis la aktuala azeno kia li estas. La posta libro tradukitan anglen estis lia libro pri Nietzsche, kiu estis sufiĉe bona libro, sed kio tutevidente montras la malsanan priokupadon pri Nietzsche flanke de pseŭdomaldesktraj laŭmodaj intelektuloj. Neniaj pluaj libroj aperis en angla traduko, sed ĉio kion mi poste legas el kaj pri Sloterdijk estas putra. Indiko de tiu putreco estas la influo de la nazia obskurantisto Heidegger, la plej tropufita sentaŭgulo de dudekjarcenta filozofio.

Habermas, kvankam mem neperfekta multrilate, tamen de longa tempo opozicias kontraŭ la postmodernisma fekaĵo.

La aŭtoro citas alian obskurantisman fekulon—laŭ mi, ne li—Jacques Lacan, pri . . . kapitalisma logiko. Ha! Lacan estas fonto de ĝuste tia logiko, kia koruptas la intelektularon.

Sed resume, jen interesa, informa eseo.

2007-03-29

Kritiko de la Kultur-Industrio

La Deziro Asfiksiata, aŭ Pri Kiamaniere La Kultur-Industrio Detruas La Individuon de Bernard STIEGLER, Le Monde Diplomatique, Majo 2004

Kultur-industrio estas termino de Theodor Adorno, kaj la pra-eseo tiutema estas ĉapitro de Dialektiko de Enlumiĝo de Adorno & Max Horkheimer. Stiegler pritraktas ankaŭ Husserl kaj aliajn filozofojn.

Miaopinie, ekster la kampo de filozofio de scienco/logiko/matematiko kie ĝi ne kompetentis, la Frankfurta Skolo estas la plej grava filozofia skolo de la 20-a jarcento.

La plej elstara ano de la 2a generacio de la Frankfurta Skolo estas Jürgen Habermas, kies ĉefokupo estas la diskurs-etiko.

Referencoj:
“Komunika Etiko kaj Esperantismo” de Helmut Welger
Derrida kaj Habermas pri terorismo de Giovanna BORRADORI, trad. Vilhelmo Lutermano
The Language of Democracy: Vernacular Or Esperanto?A Comparison between the Multiculturalist and Cosmopolitan Perspectives by Daniele Archibugi