Showing posts with label internacia lingvo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label internacia lingvo. Show all posts

2018-12-11

Mór Jókai & planlingvoj

Lastatempe mi afiŝis pri kolekto da esperantologiaj referaĵoj: Memorlibro: Esperantologia prelegaro, en kiu vi trovos listigon da elektitaj kontribuoj.

Nun mi atentigas pri du rimarkindaj referaĵoj de Árpád Rátkai:

"Lingvoplanado en Hungario" (442-461)
"La internacilingva movado en Hungario ĝis la apero de Esperanto" (462-490)

El tiuj mi tiris ĉerpaĵojn pri fama hungara verkisto Mór Jókai (1825–1904), kiu traktis la temon de mondlingvo en kelkaj verkoj:

Pri Mór Jókai & planlingvoj de Árpád Ràtkai

Tie vi trovos ankaŭ tabelon da gravaj hungaroj kiuj pritraktis la interlingvan temon inter 1772 & 1956.

Miareteje vi trovos plurajn ligitajn erojn en Esperanto kaj en la angla lingvo pri Mór Jókai kaj pri la historio de interlingvistiko en Hungario kaj Eŭropo. Mi listigos jene nur tiujn rilate al Mór Jókai kaj interlingvistiko:

Mór Jókai” de Zsuzsa Varga-Haszonits
Volapuka Lando en Siberio” (Pri "Csalavér" de Mór Jókai)

2016-05-20

Harmony of Babel

Harmony of Babel: profiles of famous polyglots of Europe
by Kató Lomb. translated from the Hungarian by Ádám Szegi, edited by Scott Alkir.
Berkeley; Kyoto: TESL-EJ Publications, 2013.

It should be no surprise that this is a Hungarian work. Hungary is not only linguistically isolated from Europe but for a large chunk of the 20th century it was the de facto cultural capital of the Esperanto movement.

Esperanto is mentioned by several interviewees. But see also especially the section "Does Latin have a present? Will Esperanto have a future?".

Contents: 

The Sun Is Shining 7

Polyglots: Old and New 11

Cardinal Giuseppe Mezzofanti (1774 –1849) 19
Sándor Kőrösi Csoma (1784 –1842) 47
Rasmus Christian Rask (1787–1832) 51
Heinrich Schliemann (1822–1890) 52
Ármin Vámbéry (1832–1913) 57
Alexander Lenard (1910 –1972) 64
What Is the Good Language Learner Like? 69

An Imaginary Report on a Round Table of Polyglots 81
Introducing the participants 83
When can we say we know a language? 139
Which is the most important language skill:
     grammar, vocabulary, or good pronunciation? 148
What method did you use to learn languages? 153
Has it ever happened to you that you started
     learning a language, but could not cope with it? 162
What connection do you see between age and language learning?
Is your knowledge decreasing with age? 164
Does Latin have a present? Will Esperanto have a future? 169
Are there “easy” and “difficult,” “rich” and “poor,” “beautiful”
     and “less beautiful” languages? 179
What is multilingualism good for? 188
Why Is Language Instruction Ailing in Hungary? 197

Selected References 213

2014-04-11

William Sanders Scarborough & Volapük in the Black Press

William Sanders Scarborough (1852-1926) was one of the most outstanding of outstanding Black American intellectuals of the 19th and early 20th centuries, individual scholars who, because of the dire predicament of Black Americans, assumed all the roles a Black professional person could fill: writer, educator, professor, administrator, civil rights advocate and leader . . .Scarborough was born into slavery and rose to become a leading scholar of the Greek and Latin classics and president of Wilberforce University.

Scarborough was resurrected from the forgetfulness of history with the publication of two books, edited by Michele Valerie Ronnick: The Autobiography of William Sanders Scarborough: An American Journey From Slavery to Scholarship (2005) and The Works of William Sanders Scarborough: Black Classicist and Race Leader (2006).

In 2010, in the course of preparing a lecture on the 100th anniversary of the Universal Esperanto Congress in Washington, DC, in addition to researching the mainstream American press for relevant articles, I decided to search the databases of the Black press for reports on Esperanto and the quest for an international language. Here are the articles on Volapük, now on my web site:

Note that the two signed articles, from August 1888, were authored by Scarborough. Given that Esperanto saw the light of day only in 1887, 1888 was apparently too soon for the American philological community to compare it to Volapük. (I don't recall when Esperanto first captured attention of someone in the anglophone world. It did not take long.)

I found another reference to Volapük in Scarborough's Works. Here is the quote with the bibliographical information on the original publication. Note also that this article was written in the heat of the imperialist scramble to carve up Africa:
The influence of civilization is a mighty lever in shaping the destiny of language. Dialects crumble before it, and the diversity of tongues drifts toward unity. The language of the intelligent must supersede, wholly or in part, that of the unintelligent wherever they come in contact, either by displacing it or fashioning it after its own mold. As the weaker languages and dialects of Europe have disappeared before the light of intelligence, so will the languages and dialects of Africa drop out of existence, one by one, it may be, as the same influence shall quicken and permeate the people. One by one will the stronger swallow up the weak, until the speech of the dominant people shall prevail, jargon first, perhaps, extinction later. Doubtless many more dialects than now exist have passed away, some of them leaving not a relic behind to tell the story of their existence, while of others bare skeletons of speech may be found here and there, but hardly enough to indicate their linguistic relations. The forces that produced these changes are still at work, but in a greater degree; and, though we can make no definite statement as to the results growing out of the invasion of Africa by foreign languages, yet again we believe that the inflectional will survive the uninflectional languages of the world. No artificial language can stand the test of time. In fact, it will hardly gain a foothold, but like Volapük, will die in its infancy. 5 [footnote clarifying Volapük] 
SOURCE: Works, p. 242. Original source: "Function and future of foreign languages in Africa," Methodist Review 76, November-December 1894, pp. 890-899.

2011-02-02

Imagataj Komunumoj: Lingvoj sanktaj, naciaj, artefaritaj

En la jenaj du paragrafoj troviĝas la esenco de la tezo de Benedict Anderson:

Sacred Languages & Hierarchies vs. Vernaculars & Imagined Communities by Benedict Anderson
(t.e. Sanktaj lingvoj & Hierarkioj k. Popolaj Lingvoj & Imagataj Komunumoj, citaĵo el libro Imagined Communities)

Iam mi tradukos la tutan ĉerpaĵon. Nun mi tradukas nur interkrampan frazon:

Kontrastu la prestiĝon de ĉi tiaj pramondaj lingvoj, domine super ĉiuj popollingvoj, kun tio de Esperanto aŭ Volapük, kiuj situas inter ili, ignorataj.
Tamen, la citaĵo ne temas pri artefaritaj lingvoj, sed pri la diferenco inter la rolo unuflanke de antaŭmodernaj imperioj kun ties sociaj hierarkioj, kleraj elitetoj kaj lingvoj supozataj sanktaj (latina, sanskrita, ktp.) kaj enkadrigitaj en kosma ordo, kaj aliflanke, modernaj imagataj komunumoj kies naciaj limoj, intelektuloj, kaj lingvoj okupas horizontalan ne vertikalan konceptan spacon.

2007-04-15

Lenin, Bogdanov, Esperanto

El anglalingva artikolo:

It is curious to observe how the principal differences between Lenin and Bogdanov extended right down to the question of language. Whereas Lenin found good reasons for strengthening traditional and Great-Russian cultural elements, Bogdanov staunchly remained a radical internationalist. Socialism could only succeed by simultaneous development in many countries, and this would require a suitable means of international communication. Bogdanov dismissed synthetic products like Esperanto and suggested English: it was used in many parts of the world and was the language of the majority of the industrial proletariats; it was concise, simple, and rich in cognate words. Since nationalist feelings were deeply entrenched, he had no illusions that English would soon become the workers' international language. But he advocated that the proletarian-culture movement, which incidentally found fleeting expression also in Germany and Belgium, should take the long view in planning for the future. [39]

[39] Bogdanov, O proletarskoi kul'ture: Stat'i, 1904-1924, pp. 328-32.
FONTO: Lilge, Frederic. "Lenin and the Politics of Education," Slavic Review, vol. 27, no. 2, June 1968, pp. 230-257. [Lenin & la politiko de edukado]

Mia traduko:

Kurioza observo estas ke la precipaj diferencoj inter Lenin kaj Bogdanov ampleksis ankaŭ la lingvan demandon. Dum Lenin trovis taŭgajn kialojn fortigi tradiciajn kaj grand-rusajn kulturajn elementojn, Bogdanov obstine restis radikala internaciisto. Socialismo sukcesus nur per samtempa evoluo en pluraj landoj, kaj ĉi tio postulus taŭgan internacian komunikilon. Bogdanov malakceptis artefaritaĵojn kiajn Esperanton kaj sugestis la anglan: oni uzas ĝin dise en la mondo kaj ĝi estas la lingvo de la plimulto de la industriaj proletaroj; ĝi estas konciza, simpla, kaj riĉa je parencaj vortoj. Ĉar naciismaj sentoj profunde enradikis, li ne iluzie imagis ke la angla baldaŭ fariĝus la proleta internacia lingvo. Tamen li proponis ke la proletkultura movado, kiu, flanke, trovis efemeran esprimadon ankaŭ en Germanio kaj Belgio, surprenu longdaŭran perspektivon planante pri la estonteco.